Friday, June 26, 2009

Day 5: Last Day of the Web 2.0 Training

26th June 2009

The final day has proved to be interesting. The objectives for the last day are:

After successfully and actively participating in the day’s activities we shall have:
  1. Recapped the work and reviewed Day 4 evaluation posted on the RUFORUM blog.
  2. Finalised the population of the ODL template with at least one unit from our respective modules.
  3. Designed a working e-content peer review process
  4. Reviewed and practiced with web 2.0 tools learnt during the course for e-content development
  5. Designed strategies for completing the modules
  6. Evaluate the workshop through Monkey Survey
Please watch this space for further updates.

Thursday, June 25, 2009

The Approach to Peer Review for RUFORUM Supported Regional Postgraduate Programs

***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***---***---

The afternoon session of day four of the training focused on issues of peer review.

There were two main exercises for the afternoon:
  1. Peer Review of ODL content developed by Participants
  2. Brainstorming session on "The Approach to Peer Review for RUFORUM Supported Regional Postgraduate Programs"


Peer Review of ODL content developed by Participants
  • An assignment was set up on one of the courses on moodle instructing all the participants to submit their ODL content via the moodle Learning Management System
  • All the participants submitted their ODL content
  • The facilitators projected each content submitted for peer review by all the participants

The general comments on the ODL content submitted by the participants were:
  1. Most participants had not put all the content for the completion of one unit/lesson of content
  2. The formatting of the content needed to be attended to for consistency
  3. A few of the participants uploaded the wrong files, thus the low scores
  4. A good number of the content submitted was very promising and with more time and focus, we are confident that it can be finalized

The Approach to Peer Review for RUFORUM Supported Regional Postgraduate Programs

The facilitator gave a background of what peer review was and this included that:
  • Peer review would subject the modules to the scrutiny of others
  • Peer review would ensure quality and flow in terms of presentation
  • Peer review would ensure that compliance to best practice is assured
The participants acknowledged that the challenges to peer review included:
  • Inadequate time for the review processes
  • At most times the author could take long to respond to the reaction of the comments
  • Expertise in terms of reviewers is limited.
  • How do we motivate reviewers?
  • The choice of reviewers is key and fundamental
  • The subjectivity of the review process must be taken into consideration
  • How ready is the content for peer review?

Brainstorming Session: Peer Review Process and Operationalization in relation to RUFORUM Postgraduate Programmes

The participants were grouped into four groups of five members and asked to deliberate on the following issues:
  1. What aspects of our modules should be peer reviewed?
  2. Who could be the possible reviewers?
  3. Suggest a possible process for the review of the modules
  4. Define the roles of the following: RUFORUM; Authors; Program Coordinators;Other Institutional arrangements

Evaluation of Day Four:
All the participants were asked to visit the RUFORUM blog and post their evaluations in the comments section. The focus areas of evaluation for day four were: Time Management ; Participation; Hotel and Accomodation; Facilitation; ODL and the peer review; Internet Connectivity

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Day 4: Web 2.0 Training

25th June 2009

The previous day began with a recap of the previous day. The main focus of the activities was on the moodle learning management system. The objectives of this activity were:

  1. Create Moodle Accounts
  2. Explore the moodle environment
  3. Create courses on moodle
  4. Peer Review what we have posted
  5. Posting ODL content in a central repository
Objectives 4 and 5 remained outstanding and will be covered during day 4.

The evaluation was carried out differently. Eight participants were selected to pretend that they were donors evaluating the following project proposals:
  • Objectives of the Moodle Session
  • Internet
  • Facilitation
  • Moodle
  • Time management
  • Participation
  • Open Distance Learning
  • Hotel and Accommodation

Objective being evaluated

Comments

Donor Decision

Objectives of the Moodle Session

Objective not well covered especially the Peer review was not handled.

Good will on the part of the facilitators.

Refer back the objectives

Internet

Internet connectivity has been Excellent for the day

Proposal approved funds given

Facilitation

Morning session catered for those that had not finished their assignments

Afternoon session was slow because people were not on the same level. A brief on what the expectation of moodle would have been put into consideration.

Step by step outline of steps to follow could have been very helpful.

Half of the funds will be released for the proposed project

Moodle

Improve the Moodle presentation

The Idea is good and deserves to be given a chance.

Time management

Lunch Breaks get in the way because participants are still doing their work.

Files have been lost due to the Server problems of saving the participants work.

Funding approved

Participation

Full Participation of members

Bonus funds approved by the donor

Open Distance Learning

It needs more time and illustrations for the participants to understand the concept.

Need for review before approval

Hotel and Accommodation

Power problem was solved but a number of participants didn’t have power outlets so starting late.

No complaint on Food, Water supply was Okay,

There is a marked improvement. Donor is happy

Evaluation Methodology

Happy with the evaluation

Very impressed and donor wants to replicate

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

Day 3: Web 2.0 Training

*************************************************************************
24th June 2009

The training is progressing well. We have just received a recap of yesterday's rich activities by Dr Flavia Kabeere. Dr George Matiya from Bunda College gave us a feedback on the additional evening session that was arranged for the Malawian team yesterday evening. This additional session was handled by Dr Washington Ochola.

Please see below the evaluation of the first two days by the Web 2.0 Participants.

Day One Evaluation By Participants




Day Two Evaluation By Participants


Day 2: Web 2.0 Training

Updates:

  1. The five Malawian participants joined us this morning after the challenges of flights that they faced on Sunday.
  2. Please visit the Facebook Group that has been created for this web 2.0 training
  3. The objectives for Day 2 are:
After successfully and actively participating in the days activities, we shall be able to:
  • Review own understanding of Web 2.0 Tools covered hitherto
  • Apply pedagogical principles in designing modules for e-content development;
  • Describe the key principles of open education resources;
  • Prepare course module materials for e-content development;
  • Populate the ODL template with course materials; and
  • Evaluate the day’s achievement
You are invited to explore the blogs that have been created by the Web 2.0 Participants:

  1. Dr Florence Birungi Kyazze from Makerere University in Uganda
  2. Dr Joseph Wafula Matofari from Egerton University in Kenya
  3. Dr Jason Munyiri Githeko from Egerton University in Kenya
  4. Dr Justus Moturi Ombati from Egerton University in Kenya
  5. Dr Charles Karuku Gachuiri from the University of Nairobi in Kenya
  6. Dr Richard Ombui Nyankanga from the University of Nairobi in Kenya
  7. Dr Martin Sailesi Gulule from Bunda College of Agriculture in Malawi
  8. Dr Jeremiah Kang'ombe from Bunda College of Agriculture in Malawi
  9. Dr Jeremy Surforce Likongwe from Bunda College of Agriculture in Malawi
  10. Dr George Grant Matiya from Bunda College of Agriculture in Malawi
  11. Dr Daud Kassam from Bunda College of Agriculture in Malawi
  12. Dr Flavia Kabeere from Makerere University in Uganda
  13. Dr Geoffrey Tusiime from Makerere University in Uganda
  14. Miss Joan Apio from the RUFORUM ICT Department
  15. Dr Benson H. Chishala from the University of Zambia in Lusaka, Zambia
  16. Dr Kalaluka Munyinda from the University of Zambia in Lusaka, Zambia
  17. Dr Mick Sikaenyi Mwala from the University of Zambia in Lusaka, Zambia
  18. Dr Zwenhamo Albert Chiteka from Africa University in Mutare, Zimbabwe
  19. Miss Fortunate Sibanda from Africa University in Mutare, Zimbabwe
  20. Dr Bernard Njehia from Egerton University in Kenya

Monday, June 22, 2009

Web 2.0 Training for Electronic Content Development for RUFORUM Supported Regional Postgraduate Programmes

CTA (Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation) has once again funded RUFORUM to run a second web 2.0 training that will focus on the development of e-content for RUFORUM Supported Regional Postgraduate Programmes.
















The training began today at the Imperial Botanical Beach Hotel in Entebbe Uganda. A total of twenty participants converged from Eastern and Southern Africa. They represent the following RUFORUM Universities:

  1. Africa University in Mutare, Zimbabwe
  2. Bunda College of Agriculture, Malawi
  3. Egerton University in Njoro, Kenya
  4. Makerere University in Kampala, Uganda
  5. University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
  6. University of Zambia
The workshop is facilitated by the following:
  • Dr Washington Ochola, Lead Facilitator
  • Ms Nodumo Dhlamini, Resource Person
  • Mr Nicholas Kimolo, Resource Person
  • Dr Joseph Oonyu, Pedagogical Issues
The workshop was officially opened by Dr Wellington N. Ekaya, the RUFORUM Training and Quality Assurance Manager, on behalf of Professor Adipala Ekwamu the RUFORUM Regional Coordinator. He began by thanking CTA, RUFORUM and the participants for working hard to make sure that this training took place. He also apologized for the postponement of the course that had resulted in other participants being unable to attend. He reiterated that all the participants were a key success factor for RUFORUM's capacity building strategy. He emphasized that the participants were at the center of that capacity building.

Dr Ekaya went on to say: "Web 2.0 training is stategic in that it aims to fulfill RUFORUM's objective of capacity building, by helping to bring the world to the RUFORUM supported courses. It is critical that the world accesses the RUFORUM Regional Programmes. The format of the programmes is also important to ensure their accessibility. Accessibility also means that the quality would improve through peer review. As RUFORUM it is important that we have strong networks and partnerships. This Web 2.0 Training is not a one off event but it is part of a larger agenda. Each participant as a champion from their institution must be clear about what is it that they can contribute to the vision. The participants must remember that they are attending this course for a purpose and that RUFORUM counts on each participant's individual commitment and that of their institution's".


The training is promising to be very interactive, informative and productive in terms of delivery of e-content for the RUFORUM Regional Programmes.


CTA Welcome Addresss


Please see the CTA speech for the opening ceremony that has been sent by Dr Rodger Obubo, who was unable to be with us during the official opening ceremony. We thank CTA through Dr Obubo for the support towards the funding of this training.

Welcome Address on behalf of the Director of CTA at the opening of the CTA/RUFORUM Training Course on Web 2.0 tools for Research Collaboration and Networking organized at Entebbe, Uganda, 22 – 26 June 2009

The Minister of Agriculture,
The Coordinator of RUFORUM
Distinguished Invited Guests and Resource Persons
Course Participants,
Ladies & Gentlemen

CTA (the Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation) was established within the framework of a co-operation agreement between the African, Caribbean and Pacific States (known collectively as the ACP states) and the European Union. This agreement referred to as the Lomé Convention, was put in place in order to improve the management of agricultural information in ACP countries. In June 2000, the ACP and EU States agreed on a new framework known as the Cotonou Agreement as the new basis for continued ACP-EU co-operation. CTA shares the stage with many other institutions in being called upon to support the ACP States. In response, it has defined its niche – those areas in which it has some comparative advantage and in which it can make a special contribution. The Centre acts as a broker between organisations and professionals in ACP and EU States. It seeks to establish fora for promoting dialogue and the exchange of information between organisations and professionals in ACP States in order to enhance their technical capacity and skills in information and communication management for agricultural development.


Based on its new mandate, CTA has two operational objectives. Firstly, it aims to improve the availability of, and access to, relevant, adequate, accurate, timely and well-adapted information on priority information topics for ACP agricultural and rural development. Secondly, it seeks to improve the communication management capacity of ACP agricultural and rural development organizations. Information and communication management training programmes are a key component of these operational objectives.


The general objective of this course is to equip academic staff in universities with the requisite tools to conduct collaborative content development in a variety of scenarios with the explicit aim of improving educational content creation, teaching, learning and research efficiency. The difference between this course and last year’s pilot workshop is that there will be more time allocated to actual e-content development. An additional resource person has been engaged to provide guidance on the necessary skills on pedagogy for effective e-content development.


It is our sincere hope that this training workshop will produce concrete results in the form of materials developed for collegiate use among members of RUFORUM universities. Capacity in the use of web 2.0 tools for the creation of electronic content for use in teaching of regional postgraduate programmes will be greatly enhanced.


You will be working in disciplinary clusters across universities to develop content in the priority areas identified. Through such collaboration, institutional partnerships will be strengthened so that viable networks will be created for sustained collaboration in RUFORUM universities. Such networks will serve as the hub to promote the development of open educational resources in the area of agricultural training and research.


The work that will be accomplished this week is only the beginning as the final product will only come through hard work and dedication in the coming weeks and months to meet our ultimate target. The challenge to all of us is to create the type and quality of materials that we desire to have in our universities. When this is done, a common platform will be provided for sharing these resources across all RUFORUM universities.


CTA wishes to thank RUFORUM, for the warm spirit of collaboration manifested in the organisation of this course. We wish to thank the RUFORUM Coordinator Professor Adipala for his close involvement in events leading to the implementation of this course. In RUFORUM, CTA has found a partner in the East and Southern African region on whom we can count for such joint activities. It is our desire that this spirit lives on so that we can achieve even more through the years.


CTA also wishes to thank particularly, the resource persons, course director Dr. Washington Ocholla, Ms Nodumo Dhlamini and Nicholas Kimolo for once more making themselves available to share their experiences and to guide the participants towards the achievement of the workshop objectives.


We warmly welcome our friends who have come from other countries in the region. Coming from various backgrounds, we believe that you possess a rich variety of experiences which we implore you to share generously with each other, to make this course a big success.


We wish you all a happy stay in Entebbe and hope that the experience gained will be of lasting benefit to your professional careers and to the development of capacities in producing top quality teaching materials in your various institutions.

Thank you.

Rodger Obubo
Training Programmes Coordinator
CTA

OBJECTIVES FOR DAY ONE

After successfully and actively participating in the days activities, we shall be able to:
  1. Identify with and describe all participants
  2. Outline and articulate the workshop and day’s objectives and outputs
  3. Reflect on and prepare for commitments for e-content development during and after the meeting
  4. Describe the emerging Web 2.0 Tools and use some of them to create accounts and design simple e-content
  5. Apply pedagogical principles in designing modules for e-content development
  6. Evaluate the day’s achievement

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

RUFORUM BMGF Inception Meeting takes off

The much awaited inception meeting for the RUFORUM, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funded project has taken off at the beautiful Ranch on The Lake Hotel just outside Kampala in Uganda. A total number of 52 participants have converged here to participate in this important process.

The meeting began on the 2nd of June 2009 and it will end on the 4th of June 2009. The 5th of June 2009 will be for the RUFORUM Technical Committee meeting. The agenda of the meeting can be downloaded here.

There are three paralell sessions running as below:
  1. ICT Working Group
  2. Monitoring and Evaluation Working Group
  3. Competitive Grants System Working Group
In addition a side meeting has been planned for the Quality Assurance Project funded under the EDULINK Project.

Please keep checking for further updates.